All of The Big 6 KILLERS of Agenda 21 Codex Alimentarius are part of the greenhouse gas RELIGION which is why the only way forward is to expose the greenhouse gas religionists. This includes Dane Wigington the FAKE ACTIVIST who preaches that greenhouse gases are real. Dane is controlled opposition, so STOP showing his two bullshit videos 'Why in the world are they spraying' & 'What in the world are they spraying' and STOP promoting FAKE ACTIVISTS that promote Dane's lies. The greenhouse gas religion is THE LINE IN THE SAND! The thermodynamics of our atmosphere depends ONLY ON DISTANCE TO SUN! Composition of the atmosphere has nothing to do with anything. Please print and syndicate the article below, we all need to be on the same page on this, because ONLY this information will kill 'the beast' we are fighting, nothing else matters! Their entire house of cards will collapse once this truth is widely circulated.
The greenhouse gas idea does not even work in an actual greenhouse!
OUR AIR IS EVENLY MIXED VIA CONVECTION IN THE OPEN ATMOSPHERE. Light a beach fire and see how fast the smoke goes up! BECAUSE NOTHING CAN TRAP HEAT! Hot smoke goes up since heat travels from hot to cold! The fact that we are in a DEEP FREEZE KNOWN AS SPACE and constantly losing heat via CONVECTION OBVIOUSLY PROHIBITS ANY BUILDUP OF HEAT!
Simple & Complete Falsification of greenhouse gas religion
Sadly, it is your own ignorance making you an enemy of yourself, not the CO2
i) no layers, ii) convection, iii) nothing can trap heat (conduction)
Take any one of these points; you have just destroyed the Greenhouse Gas Religion.
GLASS cannot trap heat because of conduction through the glass, and you
really think a TRACE GAS is going to do it? Up high where it's freezing
cold and the convection currents 100's of miles per hour, you think a
trace gas exists as a layer that absorbs accumulates and reflects heat
to earth in the opposite direction from cold to hot instead of hot to
A greenhouse works by trapping warmed air close to the source of heat. The ground level air gets warmed by the heat radiating from the sun-warmed-earth; the warmed air can't rise up (convect) into cold outer space because it is trapped by the GLASS. Temperature will rise only to a point because of continual loss of heat THROUGH the GLASS.
Heat transfer through/by/via solids is known as conduction. The air
outside the glass is warmed and the heat is sent up into cold outer
space. This is why the higher up you go, the colder it gets, because the
source of heat is the sun-warmed-earth.
The function of a greenhouse then is the prevention of CONVECTION in order to increase temperature by stopping warmed air rising from the heat source and taking heat into space.
This is a key point because in the open free flowing atmosphere, there is nothing to prevent CONVECTION!
Therefore there is no greenhouse effect. It therefore follows that
in the open atmosphere greenhouse gases do not exist. In fact, the only
time it is accurate to call a gas a greenhouse gas is, of course, when
the gas in question is located inside a greenhouse.
Anything else is fallacious. A fallacious argument with the intent to deceive, also known as sophistry.
No substance can trap heat
BECAUSE OF CONDUCTION & CONVECTION
Thermal conductivity says amount of HEAT energy a substance absorbs EXACTLY EQUALS amount it re-emits. HEAT conducts right through glass and then convects straight up into space.
Just try getting the heat back into your cup of coffee after it cools down!
HEAT is constantly sucked straight up into space by this process of mixing:
CONVECTION precludes existence of 'LAYERS'!
Without this false premise or fallacious argument of separate atmospheric gas layers, the whole crooked AGW theory cannot exist!
COMPETENT PHYSICISTS HAVE ALWAYS KNOWN!
INDEPENDENT PHYSICS RESEARCHER
HARRY DALE HUFFMAN MONDAY 22 NOVEMBER 2010
There is no greenhouse effect on Venus with 96.5% carbon dioxide, and
none on the Earth with just a trace (.04%) of carbon dioxide.
Atmospheric composition is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT BECAUSE NOTHING CAN TRAP
DISTANCE TO THE SUN IS THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS!
Thus, if you pulled Venus to same distance as Earth from Sun, you would get the SAME TEMPERATURE at any SAME PRESSURE on either planet!
Without ANY greenhouse effect as promulgated by the IPCC, at any given
pressure within the range of the Earth atmosphere, the temperature of
the Venus atmosphere should be 1.176 times that of the corresponding
at 1000 millibars (mb), T_earth=287.4 (K), T_venus=338.6, ratio=1.178
at 900 mb, T_earth=281.7, T_venus=331.4, ratio=1.176
at 800 mb, T_earth=275.5, T_venus=322.9, ratio=1.172
at 700 mb, T_earth=268.6, T_venus=315.0, ratio=1.173
at 600 mb, T_earth=260.8, T_venus=302.1, ratio=1.158
at 500 mb, T_earth=251.9, T_venus=291.4, ratio=1.157
at 400 mb, T_earth=241.4, T_venus=278.6, ratio=1.154
at 300 mb, T_earth=228.6, T_venus=262.9, ratio=1.150
at 200 mb, T_earth=211.6, T_venus=247.1, ratio=1.168
(Venus temperatures are +/- 1.4K, Earth temp. are from std. atm)
Venus data in the [T_Venus] column was taken by Magellan spacecraft in 1991
The actual ratio overall is 1.165 +/- 0.015 = 0.991 x 1.176.
It does not vary from the no-greenhouse theoretical value at any point by more than about 2%.
There is no sign whatever of a greenhouse effect on either planet!
Tv/Te = 1/√A
v = Venus e = Earth A = 93/67.25 Tv/Te = 1/√A
Venus is closer to the Sun, and gets proportionally more
power from it. Earth is 93 million miles from the Sun, on average,
while Venus is only 67.25 million. Since the intensity of the Sun's
radiation decreases with distance from it as 1 over r-squared, Venus
receives (93/67.25) squared, or 1.91 times the power per unit area that Earth receives, on average.
The radiating temperature of Venus should be 1.176 times that of the Earth.
(The 1.176 factor relates the Kelvin temperatures.)
"Since the radiating temperature of an isolated body in space varies as
the fourth-root of the power incident upon it, by the
Stefan-Boltzmann law, the radiating temperature of Venus should be the
fourth-root of 1.91 (or the square-root of 93/67.25) = 1.176 times
that of the Earth. Furthermore, since the atmospheric pressure varies
as the temperature, the temperature at any given pressure level in the
Venusian atmosphere should be 1.176 times the temperature at that same
pressure level in the Earth atmosphere, INDEPENDENT OF THE DIFFERENT
LEVELS OF INFRARED ABSORPTION in the two atmospheres. In particular,
the averaged temperature at 1000 millibars on Earth is about 288K, so
the corresponding temperature on Venus, WITHOUT ANY GREENHOUSE EFFECT,
should be 1.176 times 288K = 339K (66ºC) and this is the temperature we actually find there from the temperature and pressure profiles for Venus. So, there is NO greenhouse effect!"
"You have just proved that climate science is utterly wrong to think
otherwise. This is the scandal that so many 'experts' in climate
science, and all the scientific authorities, will not face. Listen to
the physicists that tell you there is no greenhouse effect; they know without having to go to the Venus data
-- and I am one of them. The continuing incompetence on this vital
point among so many scientists, for more than a century, is amazing,
INFRA RED RADIATION IS THE KEY
At any given point in time, the atmosphere is warmed - as much as it
will ever be (fully loaded) - by the Sun's Infra Red radiation
(DIRECTLY) up to its maximum capacity to absorb IR radiation. This is
EXACTLY WHY atmospheric temperature on the side that faces the Sun is
SAME as dark side.
It is meaningless to discuss anything but distance to the Sun.
You are miseducated by the consensus arguments you have read:
The infamous Kiehl-Trenberth atmospheric “Energy Budget” diagram,
and all the radiative heat transfer theorists, identify the amount of
infrared radiation emitted upward by the Earth’s surface as 390 W/m^2.
This is just the radiation emitted by a blackbody (not a “gray body”,
with non-zero emissivity) at the temperature of the Earth’s surface,
not the actual radiation emitted by the surface (as many consensus
defenders nevertheless insist). As the above link shows, it also
violates the conservation of energy, since 390 W/m^2 is larger than the
average 342 W/m^2 provided by the Sun (the atmosphere’s sole heat
source, as the consensus agrees). The radiative “experts” also
interpret the upward infrared radiation, as actually measured at the top
of the tropopause, in accordance with the same
Earth’s-surface-is-a-blackbody assumption (again, no emissivity
correction), and identify the difference between the tropopause-measured
radiation, and that from a blackbody at the Earth’s surface
temperature, as the “greenhouse effect”. Again, they are really just
assuming the Earth’s surface is a blackbody. The concept of a “gray
body” apparently is enough to satisfy the radiative transfer theory, but
that theor fails to capture the true thermodynamics of the atmospheres
of both Earth and Venus (despite their great physical differences,
both atmospheres share precisely the same thermodynamics). My Venus/Earth temperature comparison
will emerge as the definitive correction to the incompetent climate
science consensus, demonstrating the FACT that the Venus/Earth
atmospheric temperature ratio, over the range of Earth tropospheric
pressures, is precisely explained by the ratio of the two planet’s
distances from the Sun, nothing else (there is no room for either a
“greenhouse effect” or an albedo effect upon those temperatures, and I
give the physical reason for this — the atmosphere is warmed by direct
absorption of an infrared portion of the incident solar radiation, not
by heat from the Earth’s surface — in the above-linked Venus article). I
have also posted my response to Monckton.