old website

Start   Why?   Intro   Overview   Planes   Spraying   Clouds   Trees   Leafs
 
TUMORS   UN   NASA

blog

 

CHEMTRAILS

by

DOCTOR NICHOLAS SALIMES DMD BSc {U.B.C.}

604-738-9991


YOU ARE BEING SPRAYED LIKE A COCKROACH!

Vancouver British Columbia & the World

Chemtrails, just one of The Big 6 KILLERS of Agenda 21

click here

40 min 4 examples:

March 2014 Suffolk UK:

chemtrail skum-take some fucking notice!...[march 2014,suffolk].

Sept. 2012 Vancouver BC:

4 FCKN TIMES! CHEMTRAIL PILOT TURNS VALVE ON/OFF Vancouver BC - SprayOClockNews CLASSIC

If you still don't get it:

CHEMTRAILS EXPOSED by DR KIRKENDALL get SPRAYED like a FCKN COCKROACH!!!!!! {geo.realtruther.com}


geo.realtruther.com YouTube playlist

{Click link above, definitive introduction to chemtrails, blood tests and geo-engineering conmen too!}

{Dr. Blaylock, famous brain surgeon, in vaccines.realtruther.com speaks 1 hour on chemtrails ALUMINUM!}

Geo-engineering fraud no such thing as contrails:

HIGH BYPASS TURBOFAN JET ENGINES CANNOT MAKE CONTRAILS


Have a nice spray!

 

The Big 6 KILLERS: CHEMTRAILS, VACCINES, FLUORIDE, GMO (frankenfood), FOOD ADDITIVES (aspartame, BPA, glutamate), MICROWAVES (wifi, iphones, stupid meters)

All of The Big 6 KILLERS of Agenda 21 Codex Alimentarius are part of the greenhouse gas RELIGION which is why the only way forward is to expose the greenhouse gas religionists. This includes Dane Wigington the FAKE ACTIVIST who preaches that greenhouse gases are real. Dane is controlled opposition, so STOP showing his two bullshit videos 'Why in the world are they spraying' & 'What in the world are they spraying' and STOP promoting FAKE ACTIVISTS that promote Dane's lies. The greenhouse gas religion is THE LINE IN THE SAND! The thermodynamics of our atmosphere depends ONLY ON DISTANCE TO SUN! Composition of the atmosphere has nothing to do with anything. Please print and syndicate the article below, we all need to be on the same page on this, because ONLY this information will kill 'the beast' we are fighting, nothing else matters! Their entire house of cards will collapse once this truth is widely circulated.



 

The greenhouse gas idea does not even work in an actual greenhouse!

 

nosuchthingasgreenhousegas.com

 

NOTHING CAN TRAP HEAT

 

OUR AIR IS EVENLY MIXED VIA CONVECTION IN THE OPEN ATMOSPHERE. Light a beach fire and see how fast the smoke goes up! BECAUSE NOTHING CAN TRAP HEAT! Hot smoke goes up since heat travels from hot to cold! The fact that we are in a DEEP FREEZE KNOWN AS SPACE and constantly losing heat via CONVECTION OBVIOUSLY PROHIBITS ANY BUILDUP OF HEAT!

 

Simple & Complete Falsification of greenhouse gas religion

 

Sadly, it is your own ignorance making you an enemy of yourself, not the CO2

 

i) no layers, ii) convection, iii) nothing can trap heat (conduction)

 

Take any one of these points; you have just destroyed the Greenhouse Gas Religion.

 

SOLID GLASS cannot trap heat because of conduction through the glass, and you really think a TRACE GAS is going to do it? Up high where it's freezing cold and the convection currents 100's of miles per hour, you think a trace gas exists as a layer that absorbs accumulates and reflects heat to earth in the opposite direction from cold to hot instead of hot to cold?

 

GREENHOUSE SCIENCE

 

A greenhouse works by trapping warmed air close to the source of heat. The ground level air gets warmed by the heat radiating from the sun-warmed-earth; the warmed air can't rise up (convect) into cold outer space because it is trapped by the GLASS. Temperature will rise only to a point because of continual loss of heat THROUGH the GLASS. Heat transfer through/by/via solids is known as conduction. The air outside the glass is warmed and the heat is sent up into cold outer space. This is why the higher up you go, the colder it gets, because the source of heat is the sun-warmed-earth.

 

The function of a greenhouse then is the prevention of CONVECTION in order to increase temperature by stopping warmed air rising from the heat source and taking heat into space.

 

This is a key point because in the open free flowing atmosphere, there is nothing to prevent CONVECTION! Therefore there is no greenhouse effect. It therefore follows that in the open atmosphere greenhouse gases do not exist. In fact, the only time it is accurate to call a gas a greenhouse gas is, of course, when the gas in question is located inside a greenhouse.

 

Anything else is fallacious. A fallacious argument with the intent to deceive, also known as sophistry.

 

No substance can trap heat
BECAUSE OF CONDUCTION & CONVECTION

 

Thermal conductivity says amount of HEAT energy a substance absorbs EXACTLY EQUALS amount it re-emits. HEAT conducts right through glass and then convects straight up into space.

 

Just try getting the heat back into your cup of coffee after it cools down!

 

Convection

 

HEAT is constantly sucked straight up into space by this process of mixing:

CONVECTION precludes existence of 'LAYERS'!

 

No layers

 

Without this false premise or fallacious argument of separate atmospheric gas layers, the whole crooked AGW theory cannot exist!

 


PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE


COMPETENT PHYSICISTS HAVE ALWAYS KNOWN!

INDEPENDENT PHYSICS RESEARCHER

HARRY DALE HUFFMAN MONDAY 22 NOVEMBER 2010

 

There is no greenhouse effect on Venus with 96.5% carbon dioxide, and none on the Earth with just a trace (.04%) of carbon dioxide. Atmospheric composition is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT BECAUSE NOTHING CAN TRAP HEAT!

 

DISTANCE TO THE SUN IS THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS!

 

Thus, if you pulled Venus to same distance as Earth from Sun, you would get the SAME TEMPERATURE at any SAME PRESSURE on either planet!

 

Without ANY greenhouse effect as promulgated by the IPCC, at any given pressure within the range of the Earth atmosphere, the temperature of the Venus atmosphere should be 1.176 times that of the corresponding Earth atmosphere.

 

The facts:

 

 at 1000 millibars (mb), T_earth=287.4 (K), T_venus=338.6, ratio=1.178

at 900 mb, T_earth=281.7, T_venus=331.4, ratio=1.176

at 800 mb, T_earth=275.5, T_venus=322.9, ratio=1.172

at 700 mb, T_earth=268.6, T_venus=315.0, ratio=1.173

at 600 mb, T_earth=260.8, T_venus=302.1, ratio=1.158

at 500 mb, T_earth=251.9, T_venus=291.4, ratio=1.157

at 400 mb, T_earth=241.4, T_venus=278.6, ratio=1.154

at 300 mb, T_earth=228.6, T_venus=262.9, ratio=1.150

at 200 mb, T_earth=211.6, T_venus=247.1, ratio=1.168

 

(Venus temperatures are +/- 1.4K, Earth temp. are from std. atm)

 

Venus data in the [T_Venus] column was taken by Magellan spacecraft in 1991

 

The actual ratio overall is 1.165 +/- 0.015 = 0.991 x 1.176.

 

It does not vary from the no-greenhouse theoretical value at any point by more than about 2%.

 

There is no sign whatever of a greenhouse effect on either planet!

 

 

SIMPLE MATH

 

Tv/Te = 1/√A

v = Venus e = Earth  A = 93/67.25   Tv/Te = 1/√A

 

Venus is closer to the Sun, and gets proportionally more power from it. Earth is 93 million miles from the Sun, on average, while Venus is only 67.25 million. Since the intensity of the Sun's radiation decreases with distance from it as 1 over r-squared, Venus receives (93/67.25) squared, or 1.91 times the power per unit area that Earth receives, on average.

 

The radiating temperature of Venus should be 1.176 times that of the Earth.

 

(The 1.176 factor relates the Kelvin temperatures.)

 

"Since the radiating temperature of an isolated body in space varies as the fourth-root of the power incident upon it, by the Stefan-Boltzmann law, the radiating temperature of Venus should be the fourth-root of 1.91 (or the square-root of 93/67.25) = 1.176 times that of the Earth. Furthermore, since the atmospheric pressure varies as the temperature, the temperature at any given pressure level in the Venusian atmosphere should be 1.176 times the temperature at that same pressure level in the Earth atmosphere, INDEPENDENT OF THE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INFRARED ABSORPTION in the two atmospheres. In particular, the averaged temperature at 1000 millibars on Earth is about 288K, so the corresponding temperature on Venus, WITHOUT ANY GREENHOUSE EFFECT, should be 1.176 times 288K = 339K (66ºC) and this is the temperature we actually find there from the temperature and pressure profiles for Venus. So, there is NO greenhouse effect!"

 

"You have just proved that climate science is utterly wrong to think otherwise. This is the scandal that so many 'experts' in climate science, and all the scientific authorities, will not face. Listen to the physicists that tell you there is no greenhouse effect; they know without having to go to the Venus data -- and I am one of them. The continuing incompetence on this vital point among so many scientists, for more than a century, is amazing, and tragic."

 

 

INFRA RED RADIATION IS THE KEY


At any given point in time, the atmosphere is warmed - as much as it will ever be (fully loaded) - by the Sun's Infra Red radiation (DIRECTLY) up to its maximum capacity to absorb IR radiation. This is EXACTLY WHY atmospheric temperature on the side that faces the Sun is SAME as dark side.


CONCLUSION

 

It is meaningless to discuss anything but distance to the Sun.

 

NOTES

 

Harry Dale Huffman Says:

You are miseducated by the consensus arguments you have read:

The infamous Kiehl-Trenberth atmospheric “Energy Budget” diagram, and all the radiative heat transfer theorists, identify the amount of infrared radiation emitted upward by the Earth’s surface as 390 W/m^2. This is just the radiation emitted by a blackbody (not a “gray body”, with non-zero emissivity) at the temperature of the Earth’s surface, not the actual radiation emitted by the surface (as many consensus defenders nevertheless insist). As the above link shows, it also violates the conservation of energy, since 390 W/m^2 is larger than the average 342 W/m^2 provided by the Sun (the atmosphere’s sole heat source, as the consensus agrees). The radiative “experts” also interpret the upward infrared radiation, as actually measured at the top of the tropopause, in accordance with the same Earth’s-surface-is-a-blackbody assumption (again, no emissivity correction), and identify the difference between the tropopause-measured radiation, and that from a blackbody at the Earth’s surface temperature, as the “greenhouse effect”. Again, they are really just assuming the Earth’s surface is a blackbody. The concept of a “gray body” apparently is enough to satisfy the radiative transfer theory, but that theor fails to capture the true thermodynamics of the atmospheres of both Earth and Venus (despite their great physical differences, both atmospheres share precisely the same thermodynamics). My Venus/Earth temperature comparison will emerge as the definitive correction to the incompetent climate science consensus, demonstrating the FACT that the Venus/Earth atmospheric temperature ratio, over the range of Earth tropospheric pressures, is precisely explained by the ratio of the two planet’s distances from the Sun, nothing else (there is no room for either a “greenhouse effect” or an albedo effect upon those temperatures, and I give the physical reason for this — the atmosphere is warmed by direct absorption of an infrared portion of the incident solar radiation, not by heat from the Earth’s surface — in the above-linked Venus article). I have also posted my response to Monckton.